🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.